---
source_url: "https://www.softwarereviews.com/categories/privileged-access-management/compare/cyberark-privileged-access-manager-vs-one-identity-privileged-management"
title: "CyberArk PAM vs One Identity PAM 2026 | Privileged Access Management"
mirrored_at: 2026-08-09T01:38:47.103Z
host: www.softwarereviews.com
cited_in_42a: true
mirror_canonical: "https://index.42a.ai/www.softwarereviews.com/categories/privileged-access-management/compare/cyberark-privileged-access-manager-vs-one-identity-privileged-management"
---

> **Original source:** https://www.softwarereviews.com/categories/privileged-access-management/compare/cyberark-privileged-access-manager-vs-one-identity-privileged-management

**CyberArk Privileged Access Manager**

Palo Alto Networks

8.2

Composite Score

60 reviews

**One Identity Privileged Management**

Quest Software

8.0

Composite Score

28 reviews

Compare CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, One Identity Privileged Management

## [How To Use This Head-to-Head Comparison](#instructions-how-to-use-toggle)

SoftwareReviews captures the most compelling, useful, and detailed end user information on software satisfaction to help evaluate, compare, and ultimately select the best solution for your business. Our head-to-head tool contrasts fourteen aspects of the software and the vendor, allowing you to get into a granular comparison between your potential partners.

Our proprietary evaluation methodology is built on decades of experience helping businesses select software. We surface key elements every prospective buyer should review and understand prior to selecting a software provider. This includes a detailed review of user satisfaction, comparing top features in the category, and, perhaps the most important element, a comprehensive overview of the customer experience, what we measure as the Emotional Footprint.

## [Overall Ratings](#overall-ratings-toggle)

SoftwareReviews uses multiple data points to measure user satisfaction with their software. The dimensions rated have been chosen as they provide a comprehensive assessment of software performance across multiple aspects of the solution and provide a quick comparison between the platforms.

Use this section to compare high-level metrics to quickly understand what matters most to you and contrast any major gaps between your options.

### Overall Capability Satisfaction

75%

79%

### Overall Feature Satisfaction

76%

81%

## [Emotional Footprint](#emotional-footprint-toggle)

Satisfaction with your software vendor is more than strong features at a reasonable price. Your relationship with your vendor will have a significant impact on both your short- and long-term satisfaction with the software and your customer experience. We quantify this relationship in the Emotional Footprint.

The information collected illustrates how users view their interactions with their software and their vendor. Compare 27 aspects of the relationship, including which vendors are the most reliable, how they typically deliver against expectations, and which ones are most invested in continuous improvement to create a powerful indicator of overall user sentiment toward the software provider and their products.

### Net Emotional Footprint

+81

### Net Emotional Footprint

+92

### Love vs Hate

+76

Distribution 9% 6% 85%

+93

Distribution 2% 3% 95%

### Importance To Professional Success

+94

Distribution 0% 6% 94%

+88

Distribution 2% 8% 90%

### Strategy & Innovation

+86

Distribution 4% 6% 90%

+96

Distribution 2% 0% 98%

### Product Experience

+78

Distribution 9% 4% 87%

+92

Distribution 4% 0% 96%

### Service Experience

+78

Distribution 8% 6% 86%

+90

Distribution 4% 2% 94%

### Negotiation & Contract Experience

+80

Distribution 5% 10% 85%

+90

Distribution 3% 4% 93%

### Conflict Resolution

+81

Distribution 5% 9% 86%

+92

Distribution 3% 2% 95%

### Relationships & Interactions

+97

Distribution 1% 1% 98%

+75

Distribution 0% 25% 75%

## There's More. A Lot More.

Log in or Register to compare these products across our entire database of detailed metrics including individual vendor capabilities, detailed feature ratings, and 25 granular ways of looking at the vendor relationship.

[Back to top](#top)