--- source_url: "https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/ping-identity-vs-strivacity/" title: "Ping Identity vs Strivacity: Which CIAM Wins in 2026?, CIAM Compass" mirrored_at: 2026-08-13T01:35:40.958Z host: guptadeepak.com cited_in_42a: true mirror_canonical: "https://index.42a.ai/guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/ping-identity-vs-strivacity/index" --- > **Original source:** https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/ping-identity-vs-strivacity/ [Home](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/)/[Compare](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/)/Ping Identity vs Strivacity Last verified 2026-05-07 ## When Ping Identity wins - Ping Identity has fine-grained authorization (Zanzibar-style); Strivacity does not - Ping Identity has compliance: iso 27018; Strivacity does not ## When Strivacity wins - (maintainer to fill, no clear capability lead) ## Both win - Both support WebAuthn passkeys natively - Both support social login at scale - Both have SOC 2 Type II ## Pricing comparison MAU band Ping Identity Strivacity 10,000 MAU Quote Quote 100,000 MAU $6,000/mo $4,500/mo 500,000 MAU $18,000/mo $14,000/mo 1,000,000 MAU $30,000/mo $24,000/mo ## Developer experience & lock-in Editorial 1–5 scores and migration effort, on the same axes for both. Lower migration effort is better (easier to adopt, less lock-in). Signal Ping Identity Strivacity DX overallDeveloper experience 3/5 4/5✓ Docs qualityDocumentation 4/5 4/5 Passkey orchestrationPasskey / WebAuthn depth 4/5 4/5 Adoption effortMigrating in Hard Involved✓ Lock-in (exit effort)Migrating out Hard Involved✓ ## Enterprise readiness Computed across the enterprise pillars from the capability matrix. See the [enterprise-ready pillars](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/enterprise-ready/). Pillar Ping Identity Strivacity Overall Enterprise-ready · 100 Enterprise-ready · 90 Enterprise SSO 100 100 Directory sync (SCIM) 100✓ 30 Organizations & tenancy 100 100 RBAC & custom roles 100 100 Audit logs & streaming 100 100 Compliance certifications 100 100 Security posture 100 100 ## Side-by-side capability matrix Authentication Capability Ping Identity Strivacity Password authentication ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Social login ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Magic links ✓ Yes ✓ Yes SMS OTP ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Email OTP ✓ Yes ✓ Yes TOTP (authenticator app) ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Push MFA ✓ Yes ✓ Yes WebAuthn / passkeys ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Biometric ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Hardware security keys ✓ Yes ✓ Yes SAML SSO ✓ Yes ✓ Yes OIDC SSO ✓ Yes ✓ Yes OAuth 2.0 SSO ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Enterprise federation ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Passwordless-only flows ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Adaptive MFA ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Step-up auth ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Authorization Capability Ping Identity Strivacity RBAC ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ABAC ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ReBAC ~ Partial ✕ No FGA engine ✓ Yes ✕ No API authorization ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Fine-grained permissions ✓ Yes ✓ Yes User management Capability Ping Identity Strivacity Self-service registration ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Progressive profiling ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Self-service account ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Bulk user import ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Admin user search ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Custom user metadata ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Organizations / tenants ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Multi-tenancy ✓ Yes ✓ Yes SCIM provisioning ✓ Yes ✕ No Developer experience Capability Ping Identity Strivacity REST API ✓ Yes ✓ Yes GraphQL API ✕ No ✕ No SDKs 10 listed 7 listed CLI ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Terraform provider ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Local emulator ✕ No ✕ No Extension model DaVinci flow orchestration + custom node SDK Journey Builder visual orchestration + custom hooks Security Capability Ping Identity Strivacity Bot detection ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Breached password detection ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Brute-force protection ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Anomaly detection ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Log streams ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Audit logs ✓ Yes ✓ Yes GDPR data export ✓ Yes ✓ Yes PII minimization ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Post-quantum roadmap ~ Partial ✕ No Agentic identity Capability Ping Identity Strivacity MCP support ~ Partial ✕ No OAuth 2.1 ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Dynamic client registration ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Agent vs human token separation ~ Partial ✕ No Web Bot Auth ✕ No ✕ No Compliance Capability Ping Identity Strivacity SOC 2 Type II ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ISO 27001 ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ISO 27018 ✓ Yes ✕ No HIPAA ✓ Yes ✓ Yes PCI DSS Level 1 ✕ No GDPR ✓ Yes ✓ Yes CCPA ✓ Yes ✓ Yes FedRAMP High ✕ No EU data residency ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Consent & privacy Capability Ping Identity Strivacity Consent management ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Preference center ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Purpose-specific consent ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Integrates with CMPs 2 listed 1 listed Scalability & regions Capability Ping Identity Strivacity Multi-region deployment ✓ Yes ~ Partial Data residency control ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Proven at high scale (1M+ MAU) ✓ Yes ~ Partial Enterprise operations Capability Ping Identity Strivacity Password-hash import ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Lazy / just-in-time migration ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Account linking & dedup ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Custom domains per brand ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Per-brand theming of all flows ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Per-brand consent partitioning ~ Partial ✓ Yes Deletion webhooks / cascade ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Event streaming / webhooks ✓ Yes ✓ Yes Documented rate limits ✓ Yes ✓ Yes ## FAQ How does Ping Identity compare to Strivacity on pricing? Ping Identity prices on tiered-mau; Strivacity prices on tiered-mau. See the pricing comparison table on this page for our editorial estimates at 10k / 100k / 500k / 1M MAU using the standard methodology assumptions. Should I switch from Ping Identity to Strivacity? Switching is a 60–90 day exercise in either direction once SDK rewrites and hooks/Actions migration are accounted for. If your team is hitting cost or feature ceilings on Ping Identity, evaluate Strivacity on the specific axes flagged in the "When Strivacity wins" list. If you're operating well within Ping Identity, the switching cost rarely pays back. Do Ping Identity and Strivacity both support passkeys? Both Ping Identity and Strivacity support WebAuthn passkeys natively per public documentation. Adoption rates depend on orchestration quality (device-aware prompting, conditional UI), not raw protocol support, see the passwordless guide for the orchestration question. This comparison is auto-generated from the underlying capability matrix and pricing data on each vendor's profile. Editorial verdict lists below are seeded heuristically from the matrix diff; a maintainer review refines them before the page goes public. ## Related comparisons - [Auth0 vs Ping Identity](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/auth0-vs-ping-identity/) - [Auth0 vs Strivacity](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/auth0-vs-strivacity/) - [Ping Identity vs Curity](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/ping-identity-vs-curity/) - [Ping Identity vs CyberArk Identity](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/ping-identity-vs-cyberark-customer-identity/) - [Ping Identity vs Microsoft Entra External ID](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/ping-identity-vs-entra-external-id/) - [Ping Identity vs ForgeRock](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/compare/ping-identity-vs-forgerock/) ## Where to next - [ToolVendor selector](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/tools/vendor-selector/) - [ToolMaturity assessment](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/tools/maturity-assessment/) - [ToolBuild vs buy](https://guptadeepak.com/ciam-compass/tools/build-vs-buy/)