---
source_url: "https://betterqa.co/?utm_source=openai"
title: "BetterQA | 50+ QA engineers x 5 AI-powered testing tools"
mirrored_at: 2026-08-08T01:08:45.476Z
host: betterqa.co
cited_in_42a: true
mirror_canonical: "https://index.42a.ai/betterqa.co/index__q__utm_source_openai"
---

> **Original source:** https://betterqa.co/?utm_source=openai

// frequently asked

## Questions we hear on every sales call

The same questions that come up on every call with Tudor. Straight answers, nothing rehearsed.

**A chef shouldn't certify his own dish.** Here's a real example: a QA engineer on one of our client's in-house teams found a bug. The project manager told him to close it because "it makes the development team look bad." Three weeks later, the product owner discovered the exact same bug in production - unfixed. That's what happens when QA reports to the same people who write the code. We're a separate company. Our only job is telling you what's actually broken.

Seven products, all built by our engineers. Five are included with QA services: [BugBoard](https://bugboard.co/) for AI-assisted test generation. [Flows](https://betterqa.co/flows-ai-automation-recorder/) for self-healing automation. [Auditi](https://auditi.ro/) for accessibility compliance. Our [Security Toolkit](https://betterqa.co/software-testing-services/ai-security-toolkit/) with 30+ scanners. [BetterFlow](https://betterflow.eu/) to prove 8 hours = 8 hours worked. We also built [Hireo](https://hireo.ro/) (recruitment) and [JRNY](https://jrny.ro/) (sales) for our own operations. **All QA tools are included - not sold separately.**

Tudor's take: **AI will replace development before it replaces QA.** Vibe coding means features that took 3 months now take 3 hours - and produce 10x the bugs. Someone still needs to validate the output. We use AI heavily in our tools: BugBoard generates test cases from screenshots in 30 seconds (used to take a week manually), our Security Toolkit orchestrates 30+ scanners, Flows self-heals broken automation. But every AI output gets checked by a human before it ships. The new frontier is prompt injection testing - making sure your AI agents don't leak credit card numbers when someone asks cleverly enough.

Our engineers join your standups, your Slack channels, your Jira boards. They review requirements **before** code is written - not after. While your developers write features, our QA engineers write test cases in parallel. When a feature is done, the tests are already waiting. This shift-left approach catches bugs at the cheapest stage - requirements - instead of the most expensive stage - production.

**ISO 27001:2022** (Information Security), **ISO 9001:2015** (Quality Management), **ISO 14001:2015** (Environmental), **ISO 13485:2016** (Medical Devices). We're a **NATO NCIA** Basic Order Agreement holder (NCAGE: 1JGAL), **Avetta** certified, **NIS2** compliant, and ranked in the **Clutch 500** (Top 500 B2B Companies Globally). We also built [NIS2 Manager](https://nis2manager.ro/) - our own compliance platform.

We build our own tools - five of them, included with every engagement. Most QA companies use Jira and Selenium and call it a day. We built BugBoard, Flows, Auditi, Security Toolkit, and BetterFlow because nothing on the market worked the way we needed it to. Second, same engineers stay on your project long-term. Domain knowledge compounds - a QA engineer on your project for 6 months catches things a new hire never would. We had a client in Nice who swapped QA engineers several times over 6 months as requirements changed. With us that's a contract adjustment, not a hire/fire cycle. Third, **we offer a 2-week proof of concept**. If you're not getting value, you don't pay. We invoice after the trial, not before.

You pay for QA engineers. Five tools come included - BugBoard, Flows, Auditi, Security Toolkit, and BetterFlow. No per-seat licenses, no add-on fees. Engagements typically start with 1-2 engineers and scale from there. We don't do one-off test runs - we embed into your team for ongoing quality. **Monthly retainer, no long-term contracts required.**

The biggest cause is ambiguous requirements - when developers build what they think was asked instead of what was actually needed. Time pressure is second - rushed code means skipped edge cases. Third is integration complexity - Feature A works, Feature B works, but A+B together breaks. That's why our shift-left approach starts with requirements review. **The cheapest bug is the one you never build.**